Thursday, August 04, 2005
Perhaps some of the lawyers out there can answer this. The House Government Reform Committee is investigating possible perjury charges against Raphael Palmeiro. Given MLB's leak of what steroid was found in Palmeiro's system, Raffy may find it hard to stand behind his "never knowingly" took a steroid stance.
If the MLB drug program promised confidentiality (my understanding is that it does), and Raffy is found guilty of perjury charges based partially on the leak, wouldn't Palmeiro have a case against MLB?
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]